The U.S. President has given Kyiv a green light to deploy American long‑range weapons against targets deep inside Russia, marking a shift in Washington’s policy.
Trump Grants Ukraine “Green Light” for Long‑Range Attacks
President Trump has cleared the use of U.S. long‑range weaponry against targets deep in Russia, General Keith Kellogg told Fox News. He cited the absence of “untouchable” sites inside Russia.
Ukraine’s Recent Strikes on Russian Rear
Ukraine has long attacked Russian rear targets; the September 29 attack on a Belgorod power plant and substation left the city powerless. The governor blamed Ukrainian forces and noted significant energy disruptions, while Kyiv was silent.
Evolving U.S. Guidance: From Restrictions to Authorization
For most of the war Washington limited U.S. equipment to non‑massive strikes deep inside Russia to avoid escalation with Moscow. Ukraine received HIMARS and a limited number of ATACMS provided it avoided far‑deep targets away from the front.
Shift Toward Greater Long‑Range Capability
Over time this policy softened: limited use of ATACMS was approved, and the administration increased flow of ammunition and equipment. By November, before U.S. presidential elections, reports suggested Washington allowed limited use of ATACMS in Russia, boosting Ukraine’s reach.
Fluctuating Rhetoric from the New Administration
Earlier, Trump publicly criticized ATACMS strikes on Russian territory, warning of escalation. After a United Nations discussion his tone changed; senior officials and the envoy now confirm that the President gives a “green light,” though operational clearances remain required.
Tomahawk Missiles: Potential and Practical Challenges
Zelensky directly asked about Tomahawk missiles, capable of precise strikes from thousands of kilometers. These ship‑borne weapons differ from short‑range drone systems and would alter Ukraine’s striking capabilities. Experts say deliveries could reach Kyiv via NATO intermediaries.
Expert Views: Risks, Realities, and Escalation
Experts offer cautious optimism about Tomahawk acquisition, noting the current U.S. stance is more reasonable than before and clarifies aggressor and victim roles. Oleg Katkow cautions the presence of Tomahawks alone will not deter Russia and warns that they cannot simply sit in a warehouse. Iwan Tymoczko stresses that full deployment needs extensive infrastructure and trained operators. Roman Switan highlights the need for integration with air‑defense systems to neutralize Russian bombers.
Escalation Outlook
Wadym Denysenko argues that Tomahawks will not end the war; rather, they open a new escalation phase, noting that Putin has effectively withdrawn from negotiations and real peace talks appear unlikely.
