A European Union initiative aimed at lowering energy costs for citizens may inadvertently increase them in Poland due to the country’s energy mix and infrastructure.
Increased Energy Consumption Will Strain Polish System
Poland’s energy structure, still heavily reliant on coal despite ongoing transformation, means increased electricity demand from households won’t automatically translate to lower emissions or costs. It will, however, increase strain on the existing system and network.
Electrification will stimulate demand, driving up prices. Significant new generation capacity is needed, but in Poland, new sources are intended to replace aging coal-fired blocks. Network upgrades and expansion are also essential, requiring greater investment than currently planned.
Funding the Energy Transition
The EU communication suggests lowering taxes and system fees as a quick way to reduce bills. However, in Poland, these fees fund network expansion and modernization – crucial for shifting the energy mix.
Without stable revenue from these fees, integrating renewable energy sources (OZE), developing prosumerism, and moving away from coal will be impossible. Reducing them without alternative funding risks hindering infrastructure investment or shifting costs to the state budget.
Gas Phase-Out Concerns
The communication promotes transitioning from gas to cleaner, electricity-based alternatives, anticipating lower and more stable prices. It also addresses protecting vulnerable households during gas network decommissioning.
Gas Infrastructure Investment at Risk
Poland has invested heavily in expanding its gas network, ensuring security of supply and diversifying sources. Prematurely phasing out gas in the residential sector risks stranded costs and a sharp increase in burdens on end-users.
This transition requires a long-term, carefully considered approach to guarantee affordable energy for consumers, as outlined in the communication.
Conclusion: A Risky Approach for Poland
The EU’s plan to lower energy prices could lead to increases and distribution risks in Poland. While well-intentioned, this approach may exacerbate poverty and exclusion. A comprehensive, country-specific approach is essential for success.

