A new report reveals that 16 percent of Poles have no idea how to react after their PESEL identification number is stolen, with Generation Z displaying the most significant knowledge gaps.
The Myth of Digital Fluency
While Poles fear identity theft, a report by ChronPESEL.pl and the National Debt Register highlights a paralyzed response to actual crises. One in six citizens would waste critical time following a data breach, marking a failure to act when every second counts.
Concerns over financial loss, fraudulent loans, and unauthorized activities are widespread, with nearly two-thirds of respondents expressing anxiety about potential data exploitation. Women report higher levels of fear than men, and one in five people claim to have already encountered a data theft attempt.
Generation Z’s Unexpected Knowledge Deficit
Contrary to the belief that younger generations are more tech-savvy, 40 percent of respondents aged 18–24 admitted they would not know what steps to take if their PESEL number were stolen. In contrast, fewer than one in five seniors over 65 reported a similar lack of knowledge.
Furthermore, formal education levels do not guarantee better preparedness. The percentage of those unaware of proper security protocols remained similar regardless of academic background, suggesting that daily caution is more vital than formal credentials.
The Financial Fears Driving Public Anxiety
The primary concern among Poles is the risk of fraudsters using stolen identities to secure loans or credit lines. Respondents also fear that criminals could use their data to activate SIM cards, register businesses, or commit further crimes under their name.
These scenarios carry risks beyond immediate financial loss, including damaged reputations and long-term legal complications. Despite these fears, only one-third of surveyed individuals stated they would actively monitor their credit history or data usage.
Passive Responses and the Need for Prevention
While many recognize basic corrective measures—such as restricting the PESEL number via the mObywatel app or filing a police report—preventative habits remain rare. Many citizens wait until damage occurs before taking action.
Because late reactions favor cybercriminals, the current lack of proactive monitoring leaves many vulnerable. Effective protection requires rapid identification of unauthorized data use before contracts are signed or funds are withdrawn.



