In late October, a PiS parliamentarian defended a developer accused of a 145‑million‑zl fraud while contesting the concept of “neo‑judges,” asserting a lawyer’s obligation to use all available arguments.
PiS MP Criticizes ‘Neo-Judges’
The MP, citing previous involvement in appointing ‘neo‑judges,’ argues that such a category does not exist, claiming that some judges question the status of others.
Developer Accused of 145 Million‑zl Fraud
The developer faces charges of large-scale deception, and the MP says he is defending the individual in court.
Lawyer’s Duty to Use All Arguments
The MP, who is also a lawyer, explains that as an attorney he must employ all arguments that help represent clients.
Media and Politician’s Response
TVP journalist questions which role the MP embodies; he replies that he is speaking as a lawyer, not a politician, and warns that increasing legal confusion could harm the state.