{"id":7769,"date":"2026-06-30T20:21:27","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T20:21:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/supreme-court-blocks-trumps-attempt-to-end-birthright-citizenship\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T20:21:33","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T20:21:33","slug":"supreme-court-blocks-trumps-attempt-to-end-birthright-citizenship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/supreme-court-blocks-trumps-attempt-to-end-birthright-citizenship\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Blocks Trump\u2019s Attempt to End Birthright Citizenship"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Donald Trump\u2019s executive order restricting birthright citizenship violates the 14th Amendment, affirming that anyone born on American soil remains a U.S. citizen.  <\/p>\n<h4>Constitutional Conflict<\/h4>\n<p>The Supreme Court determined that Donald Trump&#8217;s executive order breached the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. This provision states that anyone born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction is a citizen of the United States and the state where they reside. Similar laws exist in 34 other nations, primarily in the Americas.<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u2019s executive order, signed on his first day in office, sought to strip citizenship rights from children of parents residing in the U.S. illegally or on non-immigrant visas, such as business, student, or tourist visas. Government lawyers argued that these individuals were not subject to U.S. jurisdiction, a term historically reserved only for the children of foreign diplomats. The decree never formally took effect due to blocks by lower courts.<\/p>\n<h4>Judicial Disagreement<\/h4>\n<p>The Supreme Court ruling against the decree was notably split. Six of the nine justices deemed the order illegal; however, Brett Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, argued that the order did not violate the Constitution but merely conflicted with Congressional statutes.<\/p>\n<p>Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, emphasized that birthright citizenship holds particular significance in a &#8220;nation of immigrants.&#8221; Conversely, three conservative justices issued dissenting opinions, characterizing the law of the soil as a &#8220;relic of the Dark Ages.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h4>Trump\u2019s Legislative Intent<\/h4>\n<p>Commenting on social media, Donald Trump stated that the Court&#8217;s upholding of birthright citizenship is detrimental to the country. He suggested that the issue can be easily resolved through legislation in Congress, calling for immediate action to end what he termed a costly and unfair practice, promising his full support for such a bill.<\/p>\n<p>In a separate post, Trump touted a victory regarding a president\u2019s authority to dismiss heads of independent agencies, noting a decision related to a 1935 ruling concerning Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He concluded by acknowledging that while he suffered a defeat on birthright citizenship, he believes the Republican Party has been treated fairly by the Court.<\/p>\n<h4>Constitutional Primacy<\/h4>\n<p>The American Civil Liberties Union commented that the historical decision confirms it is the Constitution, not the president, that defines who may become a citizen. The organization added that the Court had protected the essence of the nation, sparing families across the United States from further chaos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Donald Trump\u2019s executive order restricting birthright citizenship violates the 14th Amendment, affirming that anyone born on American soil remains a U.S. citizen. Constitutional Conflict The Supreme Court determined that Donald Trump&#8217;s executive order breached the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. This provision states that anyone born or naturalized [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wpai_generated_summary":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics-and-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7769"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7769\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bizonews.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}