Judge Sentences Łukasz Żak to 20 Years for Fatal Trasa Łazienkowska Crash
On July 16, the District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście sentenced Łukasz Żak to 20 years in prison for causing a fatal high-speed crash on the Trasa Łazienkowska while intoxicated and disqualified from...
On July 16, the District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście sentenced Łukasz Żak to 20 years in prison for causing a fatal high-speed crash on the Trasa Łazienkowska while intoxicated and disqualified from driving.
Table Of Content
Deliberate Violation of Traffic Rules
Judge Maciej Mitera emphasized that although causing a traffic accident is legally categorized as an unintentional offense, Żak knowingly and intentionally violated basic traffic rules. The court rejected the defense’s argument that the incident was a mere mistake, noting that Żak was fully aware he had consumed alcohol before deciding to drive.
According to expert testimony, Żak was driving a Volkswagen Arteon at approximately 226 km/h in an 80 km/h zone while recording his journey on a mobile phone. The judge described the vehicle as a “small tank,” noting that such speeds made it impossible for other road users to react or even detect his presence.
A Pattern of Criminal Behavior
The 20-year sentence takes into account Żak’s history of recidivism and his behavior throughout the trial, which the judge described as lacking any genuine reflection. At the time of the September 15, 2024, crash, Żak was already under a lifetime ban from operating motor vehicles.
The court ordered a lifetime driving ban, 10,000 PLN for the Post-Penitentiary Assistance Fund, 900,000 PLN in compensation for the deceased’s family, and 150,000 PLN for the injured passenger, Paulina K. The judgment is not yet final, and the defense has announced an appeal.
Seeking Accountability and Public Safety
Judge Mitera stated that the ruling was based strictly on facts and evidence within the case files, rather than public or media pressure. He highlighted that the severity of the sentence is intended to protect the public from drivers who consciously choose to endanger others.
The judge concluded by expressing his belief in the penitentiary system’s ability to discipline the offender. He noted that the sentence reflects the totality of the accused’s actions, his extreme lack of remorse during proceedings, and the urgent need to prevent further tragedies on the road.


