The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled against automatically invalidating Polish mortgage loans initially taken in złoty and later converted to Swiss francs.
Invalid Annexes, Valid Contracts
The TSUE stated that a flawed annex converting a loan can be deemed invalid, but this does not automatically invalidate the entire credit agreement. The mere presence of unfair clauses in an annex is insufficient grounds for complete cancellation of the obligation.
Specific Loan Category Affected
The ruling applies specifically to loans originally issued in Polish złoty and subsequently “converted” to Swiss franc loans, a practice common around 2007.
Annex Invalidation, Contract Continues
If a court deems the annex unfair, it should be removed from the agreement. This reverts the loan to its original form – a złoty loan, as if the currency conversion never occurred.
Protecting Consumers, Assessing Impact
The TSUE emphasized that national courts must assess the consequences of such a solution for the client in each case. If reverting to a złoty loan is demonstrably disadvantageous to the borrower, appropriate protection must be ensured.
In practice, courts may intervene in settlements between parties or partially transfer costs to banks – especially when banks employed unfair clauses.
Expert Commentary
Dr. Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Banks Association, highlighted the practical significance of the ruling for Polish courts: “Despite the annulment of the annex on which the currency conversion was based, the original agreement remains in force.” Maintaining the agreement requires a case-by-case assessment, including an analysis of economic effects and ensuring consumer protection.
Narrow Scope of the Ruling
The Polish Banks Association stresses that the ruling concerns a narrow category of cases and does not apply to other types of loans, including those based on the WIBOR rate.
Individual Case Analysis Required
The TSUE ruling does not close disputes but establishes a framework for their resolution. Each case will be analyzed individually – considering the content of the annex, the borrower’s situation, and the consequences of its potential removal.
For borrowers, this means the path to invalidating the entire agreement in such cases will be more difficult. For banks, it means disputes will not disappear but will be conducted according to more precise rules.
Material protected by copyright law – all rights reserved. Further distribution of the article with the publisher’s consent INFOR PL S.A. Purchase a license. Enter the email address of the selected person, and we will send them free access to this article. Related.
