Penal Code Reforms Take Effect Following Skrzypek Case
Crucial amendments to the Penal Code are now in force, granting courts the power to review prosecutor decisions that previously barred legal counsel from attending witness interrogations during...
Crucial amendments to the Penal Code are now in force, granting courts the power to review prosecutor decisions that previously barred legal counsel from attending witness interrogations during preparatory proceedings.
Table Of Content
New Judicial Oversight for Witness Representation
The amendment introduces a vital mechanism allowing local district courts to review complaints regarding a prosecutor’s refusal to allow a witness’s legal counsel to participate in an interrogation. Previously, these appeals were handled by the prosecutor’s own superior.
The district court must now resolve such complaints within seven days of receipt. Furthermore, non-party witnesses may only be interrogated without their counsel in exceptional “urgent cases” before a decision on exclusion becomes legally binding.
Legislative Origins and the Barbara Skrzypek Case
The legal changes were spurred by the high-profile interrogation of Barbara Skrzypek, a long-time aide to PiS leader Jarosław Kaczyński, who passed away on March 15 of last year. Days prior to her death, she was questioned as a witness regarding the Srebrna company investigation, during which the presiding prosecutor denied her legal counsel’s presence.
While PiS politicians suggested a link between the interrogation and her death, the Warsaw-Praga District Prosecutor’s Office later closed the investigation into her death, concluding it was caused by a heart attack and that the stress of the interrogation played no causal role.
Implementation and Regulatory Context
The legislation, prepared by the Ministry of Justice, was passed by the Sejm in May, approved by the Senate in June, and signed by the President in early July. It aims to provide citizens with greater legal security and real protection of their interests in court.
According to the transitional provisions, procedural actions taken before the new law’s effective date remain valid, provided they were conducted in accordance with the regulations previously in force.


